2007년 11월 18일 일요일

New 45nm CPU First Look-Intel C2D E8500 4.7G On Air Cooler

Left-45nm QX9650
Right-45nm E8500
E8500 333X9.5=>3.16G 6MB








DRAM: CORSAIR TWIN3X2048-1800C7DF


1800 CL7 7-7-20











VGA: ELSA 8800GT 512MB
















MB: ASUS P5K3-DELUXE



















CPU:INTEL Core 2 Duo E8500



MB: ASUS P5K3-DELUXE



DRAM:CORSAIR TWIN3X2048-1800C7DF



VGA:ELSA 8800GT 512MBHD:Seagate 7200.10 320G





POWER:Corsair HX520W Modular Power Supply





Cooler:Thermaltake V1

















Default:333X9.5







4000Mhz SP2004


Gigabyte introduces Mainboard that supports Quad CrossFire based on AMD 790FX chipset for AM2+ Phenom processor

AMD is finally ready to release it's quad core desktop processor. This desktop processor is named Phenom. In the initial release of the new CPU which aims at Intel Q6600, it will come in various frequencies. There will be a GP 9500, GP 9600 and a GP 9700.
The CPU we look at is the GP 9600, it is clocked at 2.3GHz and has a multiplier of 11.5x and clock at 200MHz. The processor is rated at 1.25v. The core name of this processor is Agena. It is rated 65nm. It has 4x512K L2 cache and 2M L3 cache.
We have prepared a review of the Gigabyte GA-MA790FX-DQ6 mainboard with this CPU. See how it compares to the Intel QX6700 down clocked to 2.3GHz, compared head to head.







ULi chipsets makes a comeback after merger with NVIDIA

Remember the old days with ASRock 939Dual-SATA2 and 939SLI32-eSATA2. It seems that NVIDIA is finally realising the goodness of ULi chipsets.

If you read our previous report, ASRock is releasing the first ever board that will incorporate the ULI 1695 chipset and a NVIDIA NF250 chipset on it.

This is a surprise move. What what i heard the 1695 chipsets are manufactured in 2007 and not some old stocks left over.

We also heard that the some NVIDIA new chipsets are designed by former ULi engineering team. Let's cheer them on to make better chipsets for everyone

AMD delays Phenom 2.4 GHz due to TLB errata

B2 rev K10 CPUs feature L3 cache miss flaw


AMD WILL ONLY LAUNCH the Phenom 9500 and 9600. Even though the channel already got its hands on the Phenom 9700 (2.4 GHz) part, it will have to be pulled off from the shelves.
In a weird deja-vu, it turns out that the company found an errata in the TLB (Transition Lookaside Buffer), just like Intel did earlier this year with complete Core marchitecture. However, unlike Intel, that has a micro-code update function in all of its CPUs, AMD is forced to delay the introduction of the part.

This comes as a huge hit to AMD, at the time that evrything was looking somewhat better. On paper and in practice, its Chipsets Series 7 are world's finest at the moment - PCIe Gen2 implementation is near-perfect, old Athlon 64 X2 parts got a new life on them (insane HyperTransport overclocking options), while Radeon HD 3850 and 3870 are once again sparking a huge war in world of 3D graphics.

However, it turns out that the processor division of AMD botched this time around. We asked AMD to provide us with official statement on this huge problem, and we got a reply back from the firm:
"The Translation Lookaside Buffer (TLB) errata is an L3 protocol issue causing a system hang when running certain client workload applications independent of platform. AMD is immediately introducing an updated BIOS which will correct the TLB errata".
This problem was found during speed-binning the B2 revision processors, and this was the cause for the Phenom FX 3.0 GHz delay. It turns out that some CPUs running at 2.4 GHz or above in some benchmarking combinations, while all four cores are running at 100% load, can cause a system freeze.

While benchmark software vendors had some problems detecting how new memory controller work - both SiSoft Sandra XII and Everest 4.20 were returning single-channel results, regardless of memory controller being used in SC/DC, dual-72-bit or 144-bit- we are still shocked to learn of this situation, that will end up with dire consequences for AMD's management.
AMD already issued a fix to all of its motherboard/system partners, so if you already own a 790FX motherboard or plan to buy a Phenom system, make sure to update the BIOS. 9500 (2.2 GHz) and 9600 (2.3 GHz) parts are unaffected by the errata. Some 9500/9600 parts may even be overclocked to 2.6, 2.8, 2.9, 3.0 GHz and they will have no problems whatsoever, while some will have this error. In any case, you should update the BIOS of your shiny new Phenom system is clocked higher than 2.4 GHz.

According to sources close to the company, 2.4, 2.6, 2.8, 3.0 and faster parts will appear on the market when the B3 revision comes to life. B3 revision is key CPU stepping for AMD's future, since it is considered a speed-bin of B1 and B2. With this errata fixed, Phenoms will have no problems competing against Intel in clock-per-clock action, but it will bring serious disappointment to AMD fanboys and market itself. They are probably blubbing already.
Now, we wonder did AMD learn a lesson here and will the company put micro-code update function in its future cores such as Bulldozer, Fusion and so on, or will the Texas part of the company still consist out of 9 to 5vers who will go home at 5PM and not fix problems that are causing this company to bleed

2007년 11월 11일 일요일

Intel officially releases its first 45nm processors

In somewhat ironic fashion, Intel has selected Armistice Day as the date for a bloody and merciless offensive against AMD. As part of this attack, Intel has unveiled no fewer than 16 new processors based on its 45nm process technology.

Only one of the chips—the new Core 2 Extreme QX9650—is a desktop part, while the rest are dual- and quad-core Xeons aimed at squashing the emerging competition from AMD's quad-core "Barcelona" Opteron chips. The Core 2 Extreme and ten of the new Xeons are scheduled to be available immediately, while the remaining five Xeons will roll out over the next month and a half:




All of the above processors are based on Intel's new "Penryn" 45nm core, the architectural details of which we've already explored in our reviews of Intel's Stoakley platform and 45nm Xeons and Core 2 Extreme QX9650. In short, Penryn brings a smaller process (45nm instead of 65nm), more and smarter cache, SSE4 instructions, a faster divider, speedier hardware virtualization, and other tweaks. The Stoakley server/workstation platform for the new Xeons, meanwhile, introduces higher performance as well as support for 1600MHz front-side bus speeds, 800MHz DDR2 FB-DIMMs, and greater amounts of memory.
Based on what we've seen in our reviews, 45nm Xeons whoop both their 65nm predecessors and AMD's quad-core Opterons in terms of overall performance, although the Opterons do have lower idle power thanks to their use of registered DDR2 DIMMs. As for the Core 2 Extreme QX9650, it secures Intel's lead on the desktop, although AMD hasn't yet introduced its quad-core desktop Phenom processors.
출처 techreport


AMD Phenom 9600 (2.3GHz) beats Intel X6800 in multimedia benchmark


출처 OCW




AMD Phenom 9600 (2.3GHz) beats Intel X6800 in multimedia benchmark. From the chart it can be seen that the Phenom 9600, the quad core processor from AMD has outperform the X6800 which is clocked at 2.93GHz in this test. One thing we noticed is that the floating point is still much weaker on the AMD CPU as compared to the Intel Core 2 Duo.


2GB vs 4GB in WINDOWS XP

- all of them are load times into the respective level/map.
- Loading the 1st time usually takes longer whereas the 2nd time will definately be faster
since some crucial files are already mapped into the ram in the 1st loading.

until i get my 64bit Vista Premium(when sp1 comes out) i shall be runnning these tests again! so keep a lookout

Retail Phenom GP-9600 might be multiplier locked

After spending some time with the Phenom GP-9600 processor, we suspect the retail edition of GP-9600 is CPU Multipier locked. With the AMD 700 Series mainboards we tested on, both board do not show any multiplier option in BIOS although they appear when we paired it up with a X2 5000+.
If that is the case, it brings us back to the old days when you can't lower the multiplier at all. You are just stucked with 11.5x for the GP-9600 or an weird multiplier of 5.7 when it throttles down with CnQ.

Maybe it is a BIOS issue or a CPU issue? Stay tuned while we update your regularly on this topic @ ocworkbench


OCW